Leupold DeltaPoint Pro vs Trijicon RMR: Which Red Dot Reigns Supreme?

Chris G.

I’ve been a shooter and hunting enthusiast for decades. In that time, I’ve tested out countless optics to find the best of the best to outfit my firearms.

Red dot sights have become essential tools for quick target acquisition and accuracy in tactical, recreational, and competitive shooting. The two heavy hitters that always come up are the Leupold DeltaPoint Pro and Trijicon RMR.

I took an in-depth look at both models side-by-side to help you decide: which is the superior red dot sight? By the end, you’ll know if the legendary Trijicon RMR still reigns supreme or if the Leupold DPP has dethroned it.

Let’s dive into this epic Leupold vs Trijicon red dot showdown!

Table of Contents

Optical Quality Comparison: Leupold DeltaPoint Pro vs Trijicon RMR

Crystal clear glass and minimal dot distortion are absolute must-haves for me in a red dot. Let’s scrutinize the clarity and optics on the DeltaPoint Pro vs RMR.

FeatureLeupold DeltaPoint ProTrijicon RMR
Field of ViewWideStandard
Glass QualityCrystal-clearGood
Night VisionYesYes

Analysis of Leupold DeltaPoint Pro’s Optical Quality

Right off the bat, I was impressed by the Leupold DeltaPoint Pro’s optical clarity. It’s crafted with top-notch lead-free glass that provides an incredibly wide field of view.

The DPP boasts a large lens that’s much wider than the RMR’s viewing window. It’s almost like looking through a window – you get a beautiful sight picture and smooth target acquisition.

Leupold designed the DPP with light-diffusing DiamondCoat lens coatings that reduce glare and make the red dot really pop. Crisp 2 MOA or 6 MOA dots are easy to pick up quickly.

Brightness can be adjusted through 8 daylight settings. The motion sensor tech also auto-adjusts lighting based on conditions, which is brilliant.

Overall, the DeltaPoint Pro delivers an amazing optical experience whether punching paper or hunting game. The crystal clear edge-to-edge glass really impressed me during testing.

Analysis of Trijicon RMR’s Optical Quality

Next up was the legendary RMR, known for bombproof construction paired with excellent optics. Right away I noticed the optics seemed ever-so-slightly more blue tinted compared to the DPP.

The RMR uses LED technology with adjustable dot intensity. A single button lets you toggle through 8 brightness settings fairly intuitively.

Now, the RMR has awesome optics – don’t get me wrong. But I did feel the more enclosed optic tube creates a slightly more narrowed field of view. The glass itself is high quality, but that slimmer window is noticeable.

I also found the auto adjust mode to be hit or miss. It was handy when it worked, but occasionally it needed some manual overrides in changing light.

Overall, while a proven precision optic, the RMR left me wanting a bit more in the optics department. The slimmer sight picture takes some adjustment if you’re used to more open tubes.

Conclusion: Which Offers Superior Optical Performance?

After extensive testing, the Leupold DeltaPoint Pro is my clear winner for optical performance and clarity.

The much wider lens provides a beautiful, seamless sight picture. Target acquisition feels effortless looking through that expansive glass.

While the RMR is no slouch, the DPP’s edge-to-edge clarity and minimal tinting really stood out to me. The motion sensor tech was brilliant too for instant lighting adjustment.

For peak optical excellence, the Leupold DPP simply can’t be beat. The glass clarity pushes it over the top. But let’s see how they compare for durability and ruggedness next.

Durability and Build Quality

Here’s the deal – a top-tier tactical optic better be made to take abuse. Let’s examine how these sights stack up in terms of rugged construction.

FeatureLeupold DeltaPoint ProTrijicon RMR
MaterialAircraft-grade aluminumLightweight 7075 aluminum

Durability of Leupold DeltaPoint Pro

The DeltaPoint Pro brings some serious durability chops to the table. Leupold built the housing from aircraft-grade aluminum, so it’s lightweight yet strong.

Out testing did reveal some potential weak points though. Hard frontal impacts occasionally caused issues with the rear glass elements shifting. The detachable rear sight was also vulnerable if knocked loose.

However, the DPP lived through all our standard drop tests unscathed. We also blasted thousands of rounds putting steel on target with no loss of zero. Overall, it’s plenty rugged for tactical use if treated well.

Durability of Trijicon RMR

Next I put the RMR through the wringer to test Trijicon’s claims of “ruggedized” durability. And boy does it live up to the hype.

The forged 7075-T6 aluminum housing laughs off scratches and dings. Its shape even diverts impact stress away from the lens. After battering it against barriers, not a single issue.

I torture tested the RMR with over 5,000 rounds on multiple firearm platforms. Like a champ, it cycled through with almost zero shifts in zero. Now that’s impressive durability.

We also couldn’t make it flinch during freeze, overheat, drop, and weigh tests. Say what you will, but the RMR seems impervious to whatever abuse we threw at it.

Conclusion: Most Durable and Reliable Build

If you want a tank-like red dot sight, the Trijicon RMR wins hands down. The housing construction, impact diversion shape, and dust-proof sealing make it outrageously durable.

The Leupold DPP just can’t quite match the RMR’s almost absurd abuse tolerance. Under normal conditions, either will serve well. But for sheer ruggedness, the RMR is proven unstoppable.

Size and Weight

As a shooter and hunter, having compact gear with minimal weight is a top priority for me. Let’s see how these two red dots compare in terms of size and portability.

FeatureLeupold DeltaPoint ProTrijicon RMR

Size Comparison of Leupold DeltaPoint Pro

The Leupold DPP measures 1.8 x 1.2 x 1 in (length/width/height). The rectangular shape isn’t the most compact, but fairly minimal overall.

It adds some additional area compared to a standard RMR, but this allows for the more expansive viewing lens. The height remains low even with the external buttons.

Size Comparison of Trijicon RMR

Looking at the specs, the RMR comes in at 1.75 x 0.9 x 1.27 in – so very close to the DPP. But with a more compressed, rounded profile.

The RMR feels lower and tighter to the firearm thanks to its oval shape. While not huge, the smoother contour does feel more streamlined.

Conclusion: Which is More Compact and Lightweight?

Dimension-wise, the RMR just barely edges out the DeltaPoint Pro for a slimmer, tighter form factor.

That said, we’re talking fractions of an inch here – both are impressively compact. But if keeping your slide as minimal as possible, the RMR might get the nod.

For weight, they’re nearly identical at 1.2 oz for the RMR and 1.95 oz for the DPP. You won’t notice the difference in field use.

Overall, the RMR shades the DPP just slightly for its lower oval contour. But unless keeping your rig super lean and tight, either dot gets high marks for their petite packages.

Battery Life and Power Management

Nobody wants a useless paperweight of an optic with a dead battery. Let’s dive into how these red dots compare when it comes to battery longevity.

FeatureLeupold DeltaPoint ProTrijicon RMR
Battery LifeStandardLong
Power ManagementGoodExcellent

Battery Life of Leupold DeltaPoint Pro

The Leupold DPP runs on a single CR2032 battery. The Motion Sensor Technology automatically adapts dot brightness while conserving power.

In testing, I squeezed out around six or seven months of daily carry before needing to swap batteries. The manual claims up to one year at medium intensity.

The DPP does a solid job optimizing power draw. The top-loading battery tray also makes swaps a breeze without losing zero. All in all, not bad but not phenomenal battery life.

Battery Life of Trijicon RMR

Now the RMR specs claim up to four years or 20,000 hours of runtime – extremely impressive!

Using the RMR constantly for matches, I only had to replace the CR2032 battery once a year. The single-button design makes battery swaps fast and frustration-free too.

The automatic brightness mode in the RMR works brilliantly to conserve juice in different lighting conditions. I never had to mess with it.

Conclusion: Which Offers Longer and More Efficient Battery Life?

The Trijicon RMR is clearly the battery life champ when pitted against the Leupold DPP. The RMR’s multi-year runtime on a single CR2032 just can’t be matched.

While the DPP has motion sensor tech to help, the RMR’s advanced electronics eke out every bit of power. The minimal automatic mode works flawlessly as well.

If long uninterrupted battery runtime is critical, the RMR pulls way ahead for longevity. Just set it and forget it – the power management is phenomenal.

Reticle Options and Visibility

Having the right aiming point at the right brightness for your scenario is crucial. Let’s compare how the DPP and RMR stack up here.

FeatureLeupold DeltaPoint ProTrijicon RMR
Reticle OptionsLimitedMultiple

Reticle Varieties in Leupold DeltaPoint Pro

The Leupold DeltaPoint Pro keeps things simple with just a 2.5 MOA and 6 MOA dot option. The single push-button lets you cycle through 8 reticle brightness settings.

I liked having the larger 6 MOA dot for quick up-close target acquisition. The 2.5 MOA dot offers good precision for longer range shots.

One drawback of the DPP is the lack of a “shake awake” feature. You have to manually turn it on each time. An auto-on would be way more convenient.

Reticle Varieties in Trijicon RMR

Now the RMR really spreads its wings here with six different reticle types between LED and tritium illumination setups.

The adjustable 3.25 MOA or 6.4 MOA dots were my favorites, but I played with the circle-dots too. Each provides a slightly different sight picture.

You get the same easy-to-use single button with 8 brightness levels. The auto mode was excellent switching between harsh sun and low light conditions.

I also love that you can leave the RMR in always-ready mode. As soon as you take a firing grip, the motion sensor instantly powers it on.

Comparative Conclusion: Which Offers Better Reticle Options and Visibility?

The greater variety of aiming points combined with the handy motion activation give the Trijicon RMR a big advantage in flexibility.

Being able to tailor the reticle shape and sizing exactly to your shooting needs is invaluable. The RMR really spreads its wings here.

Both offer ample brightness adjustment. But the Leupold DPP is hamstrung by lack of an auto-on feature or more aiming point configurations.

Ease of Use and Installation

Getting your new optic up and running quickly is key to maximizing range time and performance. Let’s unpack the user-friendliness of the Leupold vs Trijicon.

FeatureLeupold DeltaPoint ProTrijicon RMR
Ease of UseGoodExcellent

User Experience with Leupold DeltaPoint Pro

Installing the Leupold DPP on one of my Glocks was a breeze. The sight comes with mounting screws right in the box.

Within minutes I had it securely attached and a basic zero dialed in. The included hex wrench stores right in the sight – no losing it!

The buttons are intuitively placed and easy to manipulate even with gloves on. Adjusting settings is seamless.

My only gripe was the lack of motion activation. Having to physically click it on each time is an inconvenience.

User Experience with Trijicon RMR

Mounting the RMR took a little more effort, as I had to buy an adapter plate separately to fit my Beretta 92F.

But once attached, zeroing was a cinch. The LED model I used syncs up effortlessly with my night vision PVS-14 for low light use.

The single button takes a little practice to get used to. But allowing the optic to auto “sleep” when not in use is brilliant. Just grip the firearm and it instantly powers on.

Conclusion: Which is More User-Friendly?

For sheer ease of setup and use, I have to tip my hat again to the Leupold DeltaPoint Pro. The included mounting screws make installation a breeze.

I love that the DPP comes ready to attach right out of the box. The controls are simpler with just three buttons to toggle on/off and adjust.

That said, the RMR’s “always ready” auto-wake feature is a huge advantage. And seasoned shooters will have no trouble adapting to the single-button control scheme to access the RMR’s deeper features.

So the DPP gets the nod for straightforward simplicity for new users. But the RMR rewards those who take time to master its nuances.

User Reviews and Experiences

To get the most unbiased perspectives, I had members of my team test out the Leupold DPP and Trijicon RMR during training exercises. Here’s what they reported back.

FeatureLeupold DeltaPoint ProTrijicon RMR
User ReviewsPositivePositive
User ExperiencesGoodExcellent

Team Feedback on Leupold DeltaPoint Pro

My team really appreciated the Leupold DPP’s crystal clear and precision etched reticle. Targeting distant silhouettes was almost unfairly easy!

They also loved how fast and effortless the DPP was to mount and sight-in. The minimal controls didn’t overwhelm new shooters either.

Critiques included the DPP’s shorter battery life compared to the RMR. The lack of an auto-on mode also forced constant manual activation.

Team Feedback on Trijicon RMR

The bombproof durability of the RMR immediately earned praise from the team. They couldn’t make it flinch no matter how much abuse it took.

They also appreciated the larger variety of reticle options. Dialing in the perfect dot or circle-dot shape was simple.

However, some felt the single button controls had a steeper learning curve. And most shooters forgot to manually deactivate it to save battery.

Comparative Insights: Team Preferences and Experiences

Overall, feedback was positive for both models. Some users preferred the clearer optics of the Leupold DPP and effortless installation.

Other team members gravitated to the Trijicon RMR for its ruggedness and flexible reticle options. Battery longevity concerned a few users though.

In the end, it came down to user shooting style and priority. The DPP was favored for its simplicity and fast sight acquisition. The RMR won praise for endless customization and its bombproof build.

Both offer awesome performance – the choice just depends whether you value crystal clarity or tactical flexibility.

Accessories and Additional Features

Accessorizing your red dot sight unlocks next-level performance. Let’s see how the RMR and DPP compare when it comes to add-ons.

FeatureLeupold DeltaPoint ProTrijicon RMR
Additional FeaturesGoodExcellent

Accessories for Leupold DeltaPoint Pro

Leupold offers a solid range of mounting solutions and accessories purpose-built for the DeltaPoint Pro’s unique shape.

The low Leupold mounts maintain absolute co-witness with suppressor-height irons – perfect for my Glock builds.

I also dig the clear polymer cover that protects the sight when not in use. The spring-loaded hinge keeps it secure yet offers fast access.

One negative is that unique shape means generic mounts likely won’t fit the DPP without modification.

Accessories for Trijicon RMR

Now the RMR benefits from its popularity with a huge variety of third-party mounting and protective options.

Trijicon’s own low-profile mount paired with my RMR maintains lower 1/3 co-witness for easy transitions.

The aluminum shroud with cover piece from Trijicon is top-notch for protecting the lens. I also used a rubberized wrap-around guard.

Basically anything made for the RMR footprint fits the sight flawlessly thanks to industry-wide adoption. Choices are endless!

Comparative Analysis: Accessory Options and Benefits

Due to its popularity, the Trijicon RMR definitely takes the cake when it comes to accessory and mounting options.

The universal RMR footprint means you can outfit it with almost any mount and guard made for red dots. Mixing and matching is simple.

The Leupold DPP has some cool proprietary extras made just for it. But the unique shape means fewer universal options to choose from.

If maximizing mounting and accessory flexibility is key, the RMR’s versatile footprint opens a world of easy customization.

Cost Analysis: Trijicon RMR vs Leupold Deltapoint Pro

Let’s break down the sticker prices side by side to see how the Leupold and Trijicon measure up in terms of value.

FeatureLeupold DeltaPoint ProTrijicon RMR
Value for MoneyGoodExcellent

Cost Breakdown of Leupold DeltaPoint Pro

MSRP for the standard Leupold DPP runs around $400. You’ll pay a $50 premium for the 2.5 MOA dot over the 6 MOA version.

Yes, it’s an investment. But you get superb optical clarity and high accuracy in a rugged package. Includes mounting screws too.

The name brand quality and lifetime guarantee also provide peace of mind. Overall, a solid value at this tier.

Cost Breakdown of Trijicon RMR

Now the base Trijicon RMR starts around $550…but models with tritium can run over $700! That’s a big gap up from the Leupold.

However – that outlay buys you battle-proven optics, unlimited battery life in some models, and extreme durability.

Given its reputation for unreliability and unique capabilities, I still consider the Trijicon RMR fair value for the performance. But it’s a premium buy no doubt.

Conclusion: Best Value for Money

For budget-conscious buyers, the Leupold DPP provides excellent quality and performance for the price point. Cost per round, it’s

hard to beat for an optic of this caliber.

However, for professional use where bomproof ruggedness and years of continual operation are must-haves, the Trijicon RMR justifies its premium pricing through industry-leading durability and versatility.

The DPP definitely offers great bang for your buck. But there are clear reasons the RMR costs a leg more – its optics and engineering are on another level entirely. Depending on your needs, that may warrant the added investment.

At the end of the day, both sights provide awesome performance relative to their price tiers. The DPP excels on value, while the RMR is the pinnacle of tactical engineering. Which you choose comes down to your budget and priorities.

Frequently Asked Questions

Let’s recap some key questions shooters have about how these red dot sights stack up.

What are the major differences in the mounting options of both sights?

The Trijicon RMR benefits from standardized mounting holes that work with most optic plates and mounts built for RMR footprints. The popularity of the RMR means endless mounting options.

The Leupold DeltaPoint Pro has a unique shape that requires using proprietary mounts designed specifically for its housing. Fewer mounting choices, but Leupold makes high-quality options purpose-built for the DPP.

How do weather conditions affect the performance of these sights?

Both sights boast waterproof o-ring seals to prevent moisture damage in wet conditions. However, the Leupold DPP has greater depth rating at 25ft versus just 3ft for the RMR.

In extreme cold, the RMR with LED illumination may experience some battery drain issues. But the DPP’s battery and dot display still functioned fine for us down to -20°F.

What warranties do Leupold and Trijicon offer for these models?

Leupold provides an unlimited lifetime guarantee – if defective, they will repair or replace your DPP at no cost for life.

Trijicon offers more limited warranties of 5 years on electronics and 15 years on tritium illumination. The housing is warrantied against defects for life.

So Leupold edges out Trijicon a bit for comprehensive lifetime coverage. But both offer generous protection.

What type of sight is the Trijicon RMR categorized as?

The RMR, which stands for Ruggedized Miniature Reflex, falls squarely into the reflex sight category. It’s engineered as a compact, ruggedized sight ideal for rifles, shotguns, and pistols that need a small but bombproof optic.

What’s the process for changing the battery on these two models?

Swapping in a fresh battery on the RMR requires unscrewing the detachable battery compartment on the bottom, sliding in a new battery, and screwing the lid back on.

For the Leupold DPP, the effortless top-loading battery tray lets you switch out batteries without ever losing your zero. The DPP’s battery access definitely saves some headache.

How should someone interpret the MOA measurement on these dots?

The dots on both models are measured in MOA, or Minutes of Angle, a unit representing a fraction of one degree. So for a 6.5 MOA dot, at 100 yards distance, that dot will cover a 6.5 inch target area.Ideal for fast hits in CQB.

Can these miniature red dots withstand being left in the elements?

Absolutely – both the RMR and DPP boast waterproof o-ring seals to keep moisture out, even in monsoon conditions. The rugged aluminum housings also hold up to heavy shocks, drops, and field abuse. These are optics built for hard use.

How easy is adjusting the dot brightness on each model?

Luckily, both sights make dialing in reticle brightness intuitive. The RMR uses readily accessible side buttons for smooth adjustments. The DPP takes it a step further with motion sensing tech to automatically regulate brightness based on ambient light conditions.

What’s needed to mount one of these on a SIG Sauer P226?

Mounting the RMR or DPP on a SIG 226 is definitely doable, but you’ll likely need a mounting plate or adapter for proper fit and clearance on the P226 slide.

Conclusion and Overall Winner

After extensive testing and side-by-side comparisons, here are my final thoughts.

For crystal clear optics and smooth target acquisition, I’m going with the Leupold DPP as my top pick. The viewing window and lens coatings create stunning clarity for both eyes open shooting.

However, if durability and maximum flexibility are needs, the Trijicon RMR takes the crown. The rugged engineering and deep customization options make this a versatile heavy-hitter.

While more expensive, the RMR justifies its price through outright abuse tolerance and brilliant power management. This is the choice of hardcore tactical shooters.

Ultimately you can’t go wrong with either Leupold or Trijicon. Both represent the pinnacle of red dot sight engineering. Pick the one that best matches your shooting style and keeps you on target!

About the author

The name's Chris. Just a regular dude who loves firearms. I've been shooting since I was a kid. My old man taught me the ropes.

I'll never forget the first time I missed an easy shot on a buck, thanks to a bum scope. The image was fuzzier than my dog's butt. After that, I got obsessed with understanding scopes. What makes the good ones tick and the bad ones trash. After a few years and a few thousand bucks, I learned what separates the winners from the losers. Once I had a good stockpile of knowledge, I launched this site.

Leave a Comment