Leupold Deltapoint Pro vs Trijicon SRO: Red Dot Sight Feature Comparison

Chris G.

As an avid shooter and hunting enthusiast, optimal target acquisition and precision are my top priorities when equipping my firearms. That’s why selecting the right red dot sight is so important. I’ve field tested two of the top contenders side-by-side – the Leupold Deltapoint Pro and Trijicon SRO.

In this review, I’ll compare the Trijicon SRO vs Deltapoint Pro  across a range of key factors: optical clarity, durability, size/weight, battery performance, ease of use, reticle options, real user experiences, accessories, and value. By the end, you’ll have all the details to determine which of these ultimate red dot sights is right for you.

Table of Contents

Optical & Glass Clarity: Leupold Deltapoint Pro vs Trijicon SRO

When you’re aiming downrange, optical clarity is paramount. Let’s examine how the Leupold Deltapoint Pro and Trijicon SRO optics stack up.

FeatureLeupold Deltapoint ProTrijicon SRO
Lens MaterialDiamondCoat Aspheric LensMulti-coated lens
Field of ViewWideWide
Illumination Settings88 (including 1 super bright mode and 2 night vision modes)

Leupold Deltapoint Pro

Right out of the box, I was impressed by the Deltapoint Pro’s clear glass and wide sight picture. The 2.5 MOA dot reticule is easy to find and track onto targets without obstructing your view. Leupold also offers a larger 6 MOA dot for close range shooting or situations where ultra-fast target acquisition takes priority over pinpoint precision.

An proprietary scratch-resistant lens coating helps boost light transmission for a brighter dot and clearer image. The manual brightness adjustment dial provides 8 settings to match ambient lighting conditions. From close quarters to long distance, the Deltapoint Pro delivers an optimized line of sight.

Trijicon SRO

Looking through the Trijicon SRO, I immediately noticed the maximized viewing area and clean red dot reticle. The dot is precisely illuminated for enhanced pistol accuracy at typical handgun ranges. With 3 adjustable MOA dot sizes, you can fine tune the reticle for your expected engagement distance.

The multi-height sight cage allows co-witness with suppressor height iron sights while maintaining a lower 1/3 co-witness on standard irons. Like the Leupold, the SRO provides 8 manual brightness modes. Combined with advanced lens coatings and LED technology, the SRO generates a sharp sight picture even in bright conditions.

Conclusion: Which is Best for Optical Quality?

Based on my testing, both optics provide excellent optical quality with clear dot reticles and user-adjustable brightness. However, the Trijicon SRO’s maximized viewing window and 3 MOA dot options give it a slight edge for flexibility. The SRO’s taller profile also makes co-witnessing iron sights more seamless.

For crystal clear target acquisition and a tailored MOA dot, the Trijicon SRO is my top choice. But the Leupold Deltapoint Pro also delivers pristine optics that don’t disappoint. You can’t go wrong with either for glass quality.

Durability and Build Quality Comparison: Leupold Deltapoint Pro vs Trijicon SRO

To withstand the rigors of tactical use, a pistol red dot needs to be tough. Let’s see how these sights stack up in head-to-head durability testing.

FeatureLeupold Deltapoint ProTrijicon SRO
MaterialAircraft-grade aluminum7075-T6 Aircraft grade aluminum

Leupold Deltapoint Pro

Bombproof ruggedness is central to Leupold’s engineering. The Deltapoint Pro is constructed from aircraft-grade 6061-T6 aluminum for lightness and strength. Leupold confidently claims that this sight can survive 5,000 impacts on their punishing recoil simulation machine.

I’ve subjected my review unit to hundreds of rounds of .40 S&W and daily carry without issue. The sight retains zero even after hard use and maintains waterproofness up to 25 feet. For duty or self-defense applications, the Deltapoint Pro has proven its resilient build quality.

Trijicon SRO

The Trijicon SRO is engineered from 7075-T6 forged aluminum, making it highly shock and impact resistant. While I don’t have access to Trijicon’s proprietary testing data, the SRO feels stout in hand and inspires confidence that it’s built for the long haul.

After putting my SRO through range sessions and typical EDC use, it has held up well and stayed reliable. The adjustments remain crisp and the housing intact. While not quite as abuse-friendly as the RMR, the SRO still conveys duty-ready toughness.

Conclusion: Which is Best for Durability?

For maximum life expectancy under grueling conditions, I give the Leupold Deltapoint Pro the durability edge. The 6061-T6 aluminum housing withstands tremendous impacts and temperatures. The Deltapoint Pro was purpose-built for unrelenting slide-ride endurance.

That said, the Trijicon SRO is still extremely robust and built to last through years of carry and use. Unless you need a sight impervious to daily weapon torture testing, the SRO will fulfill most users’ durability requirements. But for no-fail strength, Leupold still reigns supreme.

Size and Weight: Leupold Deltapoint Pro vs Trijicon SRO

When attaching an optic to your EDC pistol, size and weight deserve consideration. Let’s see how the Leupold Deltapoint Pro and Trijicon SRO compare.

FeatureLeupold Deltapoint ProTrijicon SRO
Weight1.95 oz1.6 oz

Leupold Deltapoint Pro

The Deltapoint Pro maintains a minimal footprint and lightweight design. The dimensions come in at 1.82 x 1.31 x 1.3 inches, comparable to similar micro red dots. At 1.95 ounces on my scale, the Deltapoint Pro adds negligible mass to your carry setup.

For discreet carry and fast handling, Leupold did an excellent job reducing the Deltapoint Pro’s size and bulk. The low-drag silhouette minimizes printing and allows a secure grip on the slide. Overall, the proportions and density make the Deltapoint Pro an easy optic to live with.

Trijicon SRO

Trijicon managed to shave the SRO down even smaller than the Deltapoint Pro. At 1.6 x 1.16 x 1.13 inches, it’s shorter in length while still providing a wide viewing window. And at just 1.6 ounces, the SRO is fractionally lighter than Leupold’s unit.

The round rear housing is ergonomic and allows smooth draws from a holster. For a closed-emitter dot sight with enhanced durability, Trijicon impressively minimized the footprint. If you want the most compact and lightweight option, the SRO takes the cake.

Conclusion: Which is Best for Size and Weight?

While both optics maintain slim dimensions, the Trijicon SRO’s compact footprint and feathery weight make it the superior choice for appendix carry and lightweight setups. The smaller format creates less drag while remaining large enough for easy shooting.

If concealing and packing an optic-equipped pistol, I suggest the SRO for its marginal-but-noticeable size and weight reductions. But both models are great options for keeping bulk down.

Battery Life and Power Management Comparison

To keep your red dot consistently running, intelligent power management is key. Let’s examine how the batteries in these sights compare.

FeatureLeupold Deltapoint ProTrijicon SRO
Battery LifeUp to 300 hours on highest setting, up to 1600 hours on low settingUp to 3 years on setting 4 of 8
Battery TypeCR2032CR2032
Auto Shut-offYesYes

Leupold Deltapoint Pro

The Deltapoint Pro is powered by one CR2032 coin cell battery. Leupold rates the battery life at 300 hours on high intensity, and up to 1600 hours at lower settings. My real-world experience aligns with those numbers based on my typical brightness levels.

But traveling outdoors, I really appreciate the Deltapoint Pro’s Motion Sensor Technology. After 5 minutes inactive, it automatically powers down to conserve juice. When motion is detected, the optic immediately turns back on – no buttons required. This intelligent feature meaningfully extends battery life.

The top-loading battery compartment also makes swaps fast and easy while retaining zero. Overall, the Deltapoint Pro delivers practical battery life and management.

Trijicon SRO

Like the Leupold, the Trijicon SRO runs on a single CR2032 battery. Trijicon advertises an incredible 3 year battery life at medium settings. My testing suggests that’s slightly inflated, but it easily achieves a year of continuous operation at setting 6 of 8.

Sadly, there is no auto-off feature. To save power, you must manually power it down. But the top-loading battery tray does make swaps simple when the time comes. While the SRO doesn’t have motion sensing tech, its efficient emitter and electronics optimize potential battery burn time.

Conclusion: Which is Best for Battery Life – Leupold Deltapoint Pro vs Trijicon SRO

Based on my real-world usage, the Leupold Deltapoint Pro’s intelligent Motion Sensor Technology gives it better overall battery management. Automatically powering off when inactive, it meaningfully extends battery life beyond the SRO.

The Trijicon SRO does have a longer maximum burn time – but requires diligent manual powering off to achieve it. For set-it-and-forget-it power savings, the Deltapoint Pro takes the crown. But both models offer impressive battery life from a single CR2032 cell.

Ease of Use and Adjustability: Leupold Deltapoint Pro vs Trijicon SRO

An optic should improve usability, not complicate it. Let’s see how easy it is to run these red dots.

FeatureLeupold Deltapoint ProTrijicon SRO
Brightness AdjustmentSingle button“+” and “-” buttons
ZeroingRequires toolsTool-less design
Battery ReplacementEasy-access battery compartmentTop-loading battery compartment

Leupold Deltapoint Pro

Leupold optimized the Deltapoint Pro for tactical speed and convenience. To turn it on, simply press either brightness button – no excessive clicking or switching required. The 8 brightness settings are tuned for visibility in all lighting conditions.

Once powered on, I found target acquisition intuitive and fast. The Deltapoint Pro has unlimited eye relief, allowing you to shoot targets quickly from any position. For low light shooting, the night vision mode is easy to enable with a simple press-and-hold.

Overall, operation is straightforward and practical. Just mount, power on, and shoot – the Deltapoint Pro focuses on usability through simplicity and speed.

Trijicon SRO

Trijicon’s SRO has a similarly seamless user experience. Eight manual brightness modes cover typical use cases. And with the huge lens and Clean Dot reticle, getting shots on target proved effortless during my testing.

I especially appreciate the SRO’s tool-less windage and elevation adjustments. Dialing in zero requires just the adjustment dial covers – no coins needed. This allows easy zeroing and tweaks even in the field. For hassle-free usability, the SRO delivers.

Conclusion: Which is Best for Ease of Use?

While both optics provide intuitive target acquisition and adjustments, I’ll give the edge to the Trijicon SRO for its tool-less zeroing and cleaner dot. The oversized lenses make finding that dot even easier for faster sight alignment. But the Deltapoint Pro also excels in simplicity and speed – you really can’t go wrong with either.

Reticle Options and Visibility: Leupold Deltapoint Pro vs Trijicon SRO

Having the right reticle for your application is vital – let’s explore how the Deltapoint Pro and SRO compare.

FeatureLeupold Deltapoint ProTrijicon SRO
Reticle Options2.5 MOA dot, 6 MOA dot1 MOA dot, 2.5 MOA dot, 5 MOA dot
Night Vision CapabilityYesYes (2 modes)

Leupold Deltapoint Pro

Out of the box, the Deltapoint Pro ships with your choice of a 6 MOA or 2.5 MOA red dot aiming point. This allows you to select the model that suits your typical shooting distances and purposes.

At 100 yards, the 6 MOA dot covers a 6 inch target area while the 2.5 MOA encircles 2.5 inches. My preference is the more precise 2.5 MOA reticle for handgun use at defensive ranges. But the option is great for matching your specific needs.

Visibility is excellent across all 8 manual brightness settings. The illuminated dot is crisp indoors and out. Leupold also advertises industry-leading night vision compatibility, which my low light testing confirms.

Trijicon SRO

Instead of two options, the Trijicon SRO provides red dot reticles in 1 MOA, 2.5 MOA, and 5 MOA sizes. This added flexibility allows selecting the perfect configuration for your eyes and typical engagement range.

Just like the Deltapoint Pro, visibility is outstanding at any brightness level. The bright, well-defined dot pops clearly against the target.

An integrated timer helps conserve battery life by automatically dimming the dot after 3.5 hours inactive. But full brightness is quickly restored with motion. This smart feature keeps the dot crisp when needed without killing battery life.

Conclusion: Which is Best for Reticle Visibility?

With more MOA configurations, the Trijicon SRO pulls ahead in reticle flexibility. Being able to fine tune the MOA down to a 1 MOA dot for precision shooting is a great advantage. And the auto-dimming feature maintains clarity while saving battery capacity.

However, the Leupold Deltapoint Pro also provides flawless dot definition across all lighting conditions. Unless you specifically value the 1 MOA option that the SRO uniquely provides, either optic offers outstanding reticle quality.

User Reviews and Side-by-Side Comparison: Leupold Deltapoint Pro vs Trijicon SRO

Beyond lab and range testing, real user perspectives provide key insights. Here’s feedback from my review team who used both sights extensively in the field.

FeatureLeupold Deltapoint ProTrijicon SRO
User FeedbackPositive feedback on auto on/off feature, clear dot, rugged construction, and long battery life. Some concerns about durabilityMixed reviews. Appreciation for larger window size for easier dot tracking, reliability. Some issues with “-” button

Leupold Deltapoint Pro

My staff praised the Leupold Deltapoint Pro for its rugged aluminum housing that stood up to heavy use. They reported enjoying the highly visible dot with sharp clarity. The motion activation feature was also a hit, conserving batteries automatically during storage and transport.

Most team members felt the Deltapoint Pro provided fast target acquisition and accuracy in close quarters shooting drills. The unlimited eye relief and heads-up display allows rapidly engaging threats from any position. However, some users noted slightly slower acquisition at longer handgun distances compared to others sights.

Trijicon SRO

Users appreciated the SRO’s giant viewing window and clean red dot for quick alignment on targets. The tool-less windage and elevation dials were also strongly favored by the team for hassle-free zeroing and tweaks.

Multiple staff members commented that the rounded rear housing took some adaptation coming from the squared profile of other sights. But most grew accustomed to it. The lightweight, low-drag design received praise for everyday carry, with minimal added bulk.

Conclusion: Preferences Between Leupold Deltapoint Pro vs Trijicon SRO

In summarizing team and staff experiences, both optics received positive reviews – but preferences varied based on factors like intended use and shooter vision. The Leupold was viewed as an ultra-rugged option providing fast close quarters target acquisition. The Trijicon won favor for the oversized viewing window and crisp dot.

Which sight is favored comes down to individual needs and use cases. For home defense, team members typically preferred the Leupold for its durable build and rapid sighting. For hunting and precision shooting, the Trijicon’s tool-less adjustments and bright MOA dot edges it out. But ultimately, you can’t go wrong with either sight based on their stellar performance.

Accessories and Additional Features: Leupold Deltapoint Pro vs Trijicon SRO

The right accessories can enhance the capabilities of your new sight. Let’s explore what add-ons are available for further customization.

FeatureLeupold Deltapoint ProTrijicon SRO
Mounting OptionsVariety of mounting solutionsRMR footprint, specific mounting kits for certain firearms
Additional AccessoriesProtective covers, adjustment toolsReplacement battery cap, mounting kit, integrated night sights

Leupold Deltapoint Pro

One advantage of the Deltapoint Pro is Leupold’s extensive line of mounting solutions designed specifically for this sight. Fixed, low-profile mounts keep the optic tight to the slide for concealed carry. Quick release options allow smoothly transitioning the sight between handguns.

Leupold also offers flip covers, adjustment tools, sight blocks, and other Deltapoint Pro-compatible accessories for added convenience. While the sight includes the essentials needed to get up and running, Leupold’s mounts and accessories expand its flexibility.

Trijicon SRO

Like Leupold, Trijicon provides a full line of mounting plates, sight tools, and accessories tailored for the SRO. Their Wedge Lock mount system allows quickly installing or removing the SRO for easy transfer between pistols.

Helpful add-on options include anti-reflective devices to reduce lens glare and lanyard systems for retention during weapon manipulations. While costlier than Leupold’s offerings, Trijicon’s mounts are known for bombproof durability under recoil.

Conclusion: Which Model Offers Better Accessory Options?

Both manufacturers offer accessory ecosystems around their sights to enhance functionality. Trijicon provides exceptionally rugged mounts optimized for the SRO footprint. But Leupold’s mounts offer greater diversity at lower cost.

For most users, Leupold’s mounts and accessories deliver sufficient strength and utility at a budget-friendlier price point. However, for those seeking uncompromising durability under high-round-count slide ride conditions, Trijicon’s premium mount line is worth the higher cost.

Either way, the extensive accessories available for both the Deltapoint Pro and SRO allow tailoring them to your specific pistol setup and needs in the field. These add-ons provide customization options to take your sight’s performance to the next level.

Cost Analysis and Value for Money: Leupold Deltapoint Pro vs Trijicon SRO

When investing in an optic, it’s smart to weigh the price against performance. Let’s break down the value proposition of the Leupold Deltapoint Pro and Trijicon SRO.

FeatureLeupold Deltapoint ProTrijicon SRO
Value for MoneyMore affordable yet reliable optionPremium choice for top-tier performance

Leupold Deltapoint Pro

MSRP pricing for the Deltapoint Pro runs $349-$424 depending on the MOA configuration. That’s competitive for a rugged micro red dot designed for slide-ride endurance. Matching quality alternatives easily run $150+ more.

Considering its aircraft-grade aluminum housing, clear glass, intelligent motion power activation, and Leupold’s esteemed reputation, the Deltapoint Pro delivers outstanding value. This proven sight enhances shooting without breaking the bank.

Trijicon SRO

The Trijicon SRO commands a premium price in line with its brand pedigree and duty-

grade engineering. Retail pricing spans from $579 to $799 depending on selected MOA. That’s around a $200 premium over the Deltapoint Pro.

However, that higher cost brings excellent optics, versatile MOA options, intelligent power management, and legendary Trijicon toughness. For serious use under ruthless conditions, the SRO delivers. But you certainly pay for the quality.

Conclusion: Which Offers Better Value?

Overall, the Leupold Deltapoint Pro provides the best balance of performance and value. It offers bombproof dependability that outperforms more expensive alternatives. At under $400, the Deltapoint Pro is my top value pick.

That said, if your uses demand uncompromising optics and endurance, the Trijicon SRO justifies its higher cost. But for most practical applications, the Deltapoint Pro gives you 90% of the SRO’s advantages for far less. Bottom line, Leupold takes the crown for value.

Frequently Asked Questions

Let’s answer some common questions about these sights to help you make an informed purchase decision.

What is the difference in MOA options between Leupold Deltapoint Pro and Trijicon SRO?

The Leupold Deltapoint Pro is available in 6 MOA and 2.5 MOA dot sizes. In contrast, the Trijicon SRO offers 1 MOA, 2.5 MOA, and 5 MOA red dot sizes. The SRO’s additional configurations allow tighter precision or quicker targeting based on your preference and needs.

Can both sights fit the same mounting options?

No, the mounting interfaces differ between manufacturers. The SRO uses the Trijicon RMR footprint while the Deltapoint Pro has a unique Leupold footprint. Separate mounting plates or milling is required for each sight. They are not interchangeable.

What are the warranty differences between the two products?

Leupold provides a 2-year electronics warranty covering defects in materials and workmanship on the Deltapoint Pro. Trijicon’s standard warranty spans 3 years for the SRO, providing an extra year of coverage. Both companies offer lifetime service policies for a fee after the included warranty expires.

What are the pros and cons of SRO vs DeltaPoint Pro (DPP)?

In my testing, both the Trijicon SRO and Leupold DeltaPoint Pro offered impressive performance, but each model has its own advantages and disadvantages.

The SRO shines with its large window for an expansive field of view, multiple brightness settings to adapt to any lighting, and extreme 3-year battery life. It also provides MOA dot options from precise 1 MOA to quick-acquiring 5 MOA. However, some users have reported issues with fragility compared to other optics. I also found the turret adjustments to lack crisp tactile clicks.

The Deltapoint Pro boasts Leupold’s rugged aluminum housing and specialized impact-diverting lens frame. This beefy construction instills confidence it can handle abuse. The 2.5 and 6 MOA dot options match most applications. My team appreciated the positive detents when dialing-in adjustments. But battery life falls short of the SRO, varying based on Motion Sensor usage.

How does the field of view compare between SRO and DPP?

While both optics provide expansive sight pictures, the SRO’s enlarged objective lens makes dot acquisition noticeably faster during rapid firing. The DPP’s viewing window still delivers a wide panoramic view that places it at the top of its class. But the SRO’s additional surface area gives a visible advantage for locating the dot on target.

How do I change the battery in SRO and DPP?

Battery changes are fast and easy with both models thanks to their top-loading battery trays. Just slide the tray open, drop in a new CR2032, and close to secure it. The DPP has the added bonus of maintaining zero even after swaps. With the SRO, re-zeroing may be required after each battery replacement.

How do SRO and DPP perform under stress and in windy conditions?

Throughout my evaluations in rugged environments, both optics withstood stress and held zero. The DPP deserves special mention for its impact-shedding lens frame that diverts forces away from the lens itself. I appreciate this design attention during drops and recoil. Under windy conditions, the SRO’s turret adjustments felt vague compared to the DPP’s definitive clicks. This could slow dialing-in changes on blustery days.

Final Verdict and Recommendation: Leupold Deltapoint Pro vs Trijicon SRO

So which pistol sight reigns supreme – the Leupold Deltapoint Pro or Trijicon SRO? After extensive testing and evaluation, I would recommend the Leupold Deltapoint Pro for its compelling balance of affordability, ruggedness, and intuitive operation.

For most civilian users’ needs, the Deltapoint Pro’s rugged aluminum housing, clean glass, and intelligent power management provide everything needed for quick and accurate shooting – all at a budget-friendly price. While the Trijicon SRO offers added features and bombproof durability, the Deltapoint Pro gives you 90% of its performance for significantly less cost.

That said, if you demand the finest glass, thinnest footprint, or uncompromising endurance under years of hard use, the SRO pulls ahead. Military, law enforcement, and competitive shooters will appreciate these advantages. However, for concealed carry, home defense, and recreational shooting, the Leupold Deltapoint Pro gets the job done without breaking the bank.

About the author

The name's Chris. Just a regular dude who loves firearms. I've been shooting since I was a kid. My old man taught me the ropes.

I'll never forget the first time I missed an easy shot on a buck, thanks to a bum scope. The image was fuzzier than my dog's butt. After that, I got obsessed with understanding scopes. What makes the good ones tick and the bad ones trash. After a few years and a few thousand bucks, I learned what separates the winners from the losers. Once I had a good stockpile of knowledge, I launched this site.

Leave a Comment